The largest trial ever run on ginkgo and memory found nothing. The Ginkgo Evaluation of Memory study followed 3,069 adults aged 75 and over for a median of 6.1 years, half taking 120mg of ginkgo extract twice a day and half taking a placebo. It did not reduce dementia or Alzheimer’s disease, and the rate in the ginkgo group came out slightly higher rather than lower (DeKosky et al., Journal of the American Medical Association, 2008).
This page used to say the opposite. It described short-term cognitive support in people with existing cognitive decline, which is a claim about a medical condition, and it was carrying no source at all. That claim is gone and the change is logged on the corrections page.
Ginkgo leaf is a supplement, not a food. There is no ordinary serving of it, no nutrition panel worth reading, and nothing here to put on a plate.
The circulation and antioxidant work is mostly cell studies and small trials. Where a large, long human trial does exist, which is the memory question, the answer was no.
Tells you how big that rise actually is once portion size is factored in.
Example:
Watermelon has a high GI (it digests quickly) but a low GL because a normal serving doesn’t contain many carbs so the actual blood-sugar impact is small.
Why it matters:
Understanding both GI and GL gives you a clearer picture of how foods affect your blood sugar both the speed of the rise and the true impact based on the portion you eat.